USPTO serial 79092662
TESMEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4144672Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 2012
- Examiner
- MARTIN, LIEF ANDREW
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TESMEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D Wells
Nicholas D Wells LEGENDS LAW GROUP, PLLC330 Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Equipment, accessories and integrated systems for the stringing of overhead and underground power lines and fiber optic cables, namely, hydraulic winches, pullers, tensioners puller-tensioners, pulleys, head boards, hydraulic compressors, clamps, and joints, the foregoing all being machines for stringing power lines and data cables; equipment, accessories and integrated systems for installations of electric catenary lines, namely, railway constant tension stringing wagons; high powered tracked trencher machines for linear excavation of underground networks and pipelines; bulk excavation machines; multipurpose machines, namely, machines for [ loading, ] excavation, [ lifting, hammering, drilling, ] trenching, [ boring, wall and pavement milling, flail mowing, ] ditch cleaning and special applications in the nature of power and data cable tensioning; on/offshore single drum and capstans winches | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of industrial installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 24, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 16, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 4, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 26, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |