USPTO serial 79092667
SYNERGY21
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYNERGY21?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software, computer peripheral devices; data input, output, transmitting and recording apparatus; measuring apparatus; testing apparatus, not for medical purposes; apparatus for data transmission; network apparatus and connecting hardware, in particular systems for data storage via the network, network cards, controllers, switches, hubs, print servers, routers, adapters, modules and network hubs; apparatus for data transmission via mains electricity; light diodes (LEDs); parts for the aforesaid goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Apparatus for lighting; lighting apparatus and installations, in particular lamps, lightbulbs for lighting purposes, fluorescent tubes for lighting purposes, LED lighting apparatus, light diffusers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Wholesale services in the fields of: computer hardware and software, computer peripheral devices; data input, output, transmitting and recording apparatus; measuring apparatus; testing apparatus; apparatus for data transmission; network apparatus and connecting hardware, in particular systems for data storage via the network, network cards, controllers, switches, hubs, print servers, routers, adapters, modules and network hubs; apparatus for data transmission via mains electricity; light diodes (LEDs); parts for the aforesaid goods and lighting apparatus; lighting apparatus and installations, in particular lamps, lightbulbs for lighting purposes, fluorescent tubes for lighting purposes, LED lighting apparatus, light diffusers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software; technical consultancy in the field of the design of electronic data processing computer hardware and software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |