USPTO serial 79092671
SOYWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4169702Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2012
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOYWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett A. August
Brett A. August Pattishall McAuliffe Newbury Hilliard & Geraldson200 S. Wacker DriveSuite 2900Chicago, IL 60606-5896Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat substitutes and meat substitute products with a soya base, namely, prepared meals consisting primarily of meat substitutes and vegetable based meat substitutes; fish substitutes and fish substitute products with a soya base, namely, prepared meals consisting primarily of fish substitutes and vegetable based fish substitutes; poultry substitutes and poultry substitute products with a soya base, namely, prepared meals consisting primarily of poultry substitutes and vegetable based poultry substitutes; sausage substitutes and sausage substitute products with a soya base, namely, prepared meals consisting primarily of sausage substitutes and vegetable based sausage substitutes; processed soya beans; soya-bean products, namely, fruit and soy based snack food, pickled vegetables in soy sauce, soybean paste or vinegar, sliced vegetables preserved in soy sauce, soybean paste or vinegar, soy bean oil for food; soy burger patties, soy chips, soybean milk, soy-based food bars, soy-based food beverage used as a milk substitute, soy-based snack foods; soya spreads; soya milk; milk substitute products with a soya base, namely, sour cream substitutes, butter substitutes and artificial cream; soya yoghurts, soya drinks, cheese substitutions; cheese substitute products with a soya base, namely, soy cheese and cracker combinations; soya oil; salads except macaroni, rice, and pasta salad with a soya base; prepared meals consisting primarily of soy based meat substitutes; frozen foods, namely, meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, or poultry substitutes with a soya base and frozen vegetable meals with a soya base; dietetic substances and foodstuffs not adapted for medical use with a soya base, namely, dietetic soy chips and low calorie, low sodium, prepared meals for non-medical use consisting primarily of meat, fish and poultry substitutes, all listed above made in whole or in part with soy | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Soya flour; soya flour products, namely, soy flour based chips, soy flour based gnocchi, soy flour bread, soy flour crackers and soy flour cookies; cereal preparations with a soya base, namely, ready to eat cereals, cereal derived food bars with a soya base, and processed cereals; muesli; whole wheat products with a soya base, namely, wheat and soy based snack foods, extruded wheat snacks with a soya base, and whole wheat bread with a soy base; bread; pastries; confectionery made of sugar with a soya base; chocolate and chocolate goods with a soya base, namely, chocolate bars, chocolate chips, chocolate candies, chocolate confections, chocolate covered fruit, chocolate covered nuts, chocolate eggs, chocolate truffles, chocolate mousse, chocolate sauce, chocolate syrup, chocolate and soy based ready to eat candies and snacks and chocolate covered soy chips; prepared meals consisting primarily of soy based pasta or soy based rice; frozen foods, namely, grain and bread based appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés with a soya base, frozen soy-based desserts and frozen soy-based ice cream substitute, all listed above made in whole or in part with soy | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | Soy based non-alcoholic beverages not being milk substitutes; concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinks for making beverages, all listed above made in whole or in part with soy | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SOYWELL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 13, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |