Drawing for KMN

USPTO serial 79092804

KMN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4137367Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 8, 2012
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KMN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Textile material, namely, fabrics for the manufacture of shade cloth; towels of textile used to cover a pillow; bed covers; quilts; bed clothes, namely, bed sheet; table mats, not of paper; unfitted textile fabric furniture coverings; door curtains; washing mittsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 11, 2023INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 21, 2023INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 21, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 25, 2023INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 25, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
May 8, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 21, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 10, 2018CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 21, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
May 21, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 21, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 15, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 15, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 7, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 17, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 17, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 8, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 8, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 21, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 1, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 19, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 7, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 23, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 6, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 6, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 5, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance