USPTO serial 79092823
SUPRACOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4008246Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 9, 2011
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPRACOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
80992 München, DE
80992 München, DE
80992 München, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Denis A. Polyn
ULLRICH & NAUMANN Bausch & Lomb Incorporated1400 N. Goodman StreetRochester, NY 14609UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware used in relation to ophthalmological applications and for laser beam control; computer software for laser beam control in relation to ophthalmological applications and for use with ophthalmological and ophthalmic surgical and optometric apparatus including intraocular devices or systems for sight correction and improvement | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Medical, hospital and opticians' services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named SUPRACOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 16, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 9, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 4, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |