Drawing for HYDRANONE

USPTO serial 79092863

HYDRANONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4014637Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 23, 2011
Examiner
HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with HYDRANONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Duane M. Byers

Duane M. Byers Nixon & Vanderhye PC901 N. Glebe Road, 11th FloorArlington, VA 22203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Development of chemical processes, namely, development of chemical production methods; development and design of chemical plants and installations; technical feasibility studies; services and counseling by engineers, chemists and physicists, namely, conducting engineering surveys, chemistry consultation; chemical laboratory services; [ chemical analyses; drawing up of expert technical reports by engineers, chemists or laboratory technicians in the field of production of caprolactam and intermediates therefor; technical research in the field of production of caprolactam and intermediates therefor; research on the subject of building construction and repair; research in the field of production of caprolactam and intermediates therefor; inspection of chemical plants and installations; technical calculations in the field of production of caprolactam and intermediates therefor; technical analyses of the production of caprolactam and intermediates therefor; ] research in the field of the environmental protection; technical research for the studying of production processes in order to achieve technical optimization; development of plants and installations, namely, development of plants and installations for production of caprolactam and intermediates therefor; adapting process technologies for plants and installations, namely, development of process technologies for plants and installations for production of caprolactam and intermediates therefor [ ; quality evaluation services, namely, tests to establish that the intended capacity of an installation or process, or the intended quality of the acquired product, is indeed achieved; quality control in order to achieve, maintain or improve quality ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2023INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 1, 2022INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 1, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Nov 5, 2022INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 5, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 5, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 4, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 5, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2020RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 29, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 15, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 13, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 18, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Apr 15, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 28, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 23, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 23, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 20, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 7, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 18, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 29, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 20, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Apr 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 8, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 8, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 5, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance