Drawing for RESISTEC

USPTO serial 79092906

RESISTEC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, ASMAT A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESISTEC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Anti-rust preparations (for preservation); anti-corrosive preparations; coatings (paints); protective preparations for metalsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 21, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 4, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 15, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 25, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 25, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 12, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 12, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 3, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 11, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance