Drawing for CHIP

USPTO serial 79092978

CHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4127337Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 17, 2012
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Saw blades, namely, blades for power sawsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 30, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 20, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 20, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 23, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 23, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 24, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 29, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Nov 4, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 17, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 1, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 1, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 17, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 9, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 31, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 11, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 24, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 5, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 5, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 13, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 12, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 1, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance