Drawing for ORGANICSHIELD

USPTO serial 79093104

ORGANICSHIELD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PHAM, LANA H
Law office

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORGANICSHIELD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathryn E. Smith

Kathryn E. Smith Wood Herron & Evans LLP441 Vine Street2700 Carew TowerCincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005organic pesticides; organic fungicidesABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 29, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 11, 2012MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION
Sep 11, 2012ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Sep 10, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Aug 28, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 28, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 10, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 8, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 8, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 8, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jul 25, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jul 25, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 24, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 24, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 9, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 9, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 9, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 9, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 9, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 6, 2012MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED
Jul 2, 2012RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED
Jul 2, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Nov 14, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 4, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 4, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 23, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 4, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 4, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 2, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 3, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Feb 27, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Feb 25, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance