USPTO serial 79093115
BERTHOUD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4152213Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 5, 2012
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with BERTHOUD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
Jeffrey A. Smith Millen, White, Zelano & Branigan, P.C.2200 Clarendon BoulevardSuite 1400Arlington, VA 22201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand-operated tools and instruments, namely, hand operated atomizers, vaporizers, and sprayers for use with industrial liquids; [ hand-held and hand-operated agricultural instruments, namely, broadforks; ] hand-held and hand-operated gardening tools, namely, cultivators; hand-operated insecticide sprayers; hand-pumped sprayers for use with industrial liquids; [ spray guns for paint; hand-operated hand tools and instruments, namely, paint scrapers for treating surfaces before painting; manually-operated grinding wheels and sanders; hand-held spray guns in the nature of hand-pumped sprayers for use with industrial liquids for electrostatic painting; hand-held spray guns in the nature of hand-pumped sprayers for use with industrial liquids for electrostatic enameling; ] hand-held spray guns in the nature of hand-pumped sprayers for use with industrial liquids for electrostatic dusting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 26, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2017 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY NOT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 12, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 29, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |