USPTO serial 79093297
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
GLOBSIS BILGI TEKNOLOJILERI YAZILIM ILET. EGIT. REKLAM ORG. DAN. SAN. DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
Ankara, TR
GLOBSIS BILGI TEKNOLOJILERI YAZILIM ILET. EGIT. REKLAM ORG. DAN. SAN. DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
Ankara, TR
GLOBSIS BILGI TEKNOLOJILERI YAZILIM ILET. EGIT. REKLAM ORG. DAN. SAN. DIS TICARET LIMITED SIRKETI
Ankara, TR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Otto O. Lee
Otto O. Lee Intellectual Property Law Group LLP12 South First Street12th FloorSan Jose, CA 95113| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images; computer hardware and software for data processing and communication | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | IRIV | IRREGULARITY ON INVALIDATION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 29, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |