Drawing for Z-LOOK3 EVO RAPIDE

USPTO serial 79093391

Z-LOOK3 EVO RAPIDE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COWARD, KATHRYN E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Z-LOOK3 EVO RAPIDE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Dental implants, particularly made of zirconium oxide; dental surgical instruments, particularly implant drills, drill taps, scalpels, pincers, raspatories, gauges, screwing instruments and ratchetsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 13, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 19, 2018CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Mar 9, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 26, 2017ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Nov 24, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 5, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 27, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 3, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 17, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 23, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 23, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 22, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 8, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance