USPTO serial 79093486
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Hot chocolate; breakfast cereals; coffee; coffee beans; ground coffee; pasta sauce; vinegar; condiments; spices; marinades; cakes; snack bars containing a mixture of grains, nuts and dried fruit; biscuits; toasts; snack bars containing dried fruits; snack bars containing grains; snack bars containing nuts; sherbets; sorbets; ice cream; fudge; bread; breadsticks; garlic bread; candy, other than for medical purposes; seasoned salt for cooking; spiced salt; croutons; crackers; frozen yogurt; chocolate mousses; pizzas; dried pasta; fresh pasta; salad dressings; dried herbs; popcorn; honeys; sugar; risotto; rice; mayonnaise; freeze-dried coffee; coffee beverages; mixtures of coffee essences and coffee extracts; unroasted coffee | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2012 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 9, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 9, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2012 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 23, 2012 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 12, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |