USPTO serial 79093812
NORSE PROJECTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NORSE PROJECTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2020 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 10, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |