USPTO serial 79093847
MAMIYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAMIYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Adkins
Christopher Adkins Wenderoth, Lind & Ponack, L.L.P.1030 15th Street, N.W.Suite 400 EastWashington, DC 20005-1503Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Photographic instruments and apparatus, namely, tilting heads for cameras, cameras, range finders for cameras, photo-developing, printing, enlarging or finishing machines and apparatus, tripods for cameras, shutters for cameras, bellows for cameras, spools for cameras, self-times for cameras, viewfinders for cameras, lens filters for cameras, lens hood for cameras, film magazines for cameras, shutter releases for cameras, lenses for photographic apparatus, exposure meters; optical apparatus and instruments, namely, body-tubes for telescopes, prisms for telescopes, telescopes, lenses for telescopes, magnifying glasses, body-tubes for microscopes, namely, lens-barrels, prisms for microscopes, lenses for microscopes; battery chargers; other chargers, namely, chargers for lithium-ion batteries; digital camera batteries; other batteries; digital cameras; digital camera AC adapters; digital camera battery cases for warm keeping; other telecommunication devices and apparatus, namely, video frequency machines and apparatus including digital cameras, digital videocameras and camcorders; electronic machines, apparatus and their parts, namely, integrated circuits, computer programs, namely firmware for cameras and computer programs for photo-development, which are not including those recorded with computer programs; spectacles, namely eyeglasses and goggles; exposed cinematographic films; exposed slide films; slide film mounts | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2021 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 30, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 21, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Apr 9, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |