USPTO serial 79093920
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL LLC, a Delaware Corporation
US
Other trademarks owned by HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL LLC, a Delaware Corporation
BE
Huntsman International LLC, a Delaware Corporation
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Other trademarks owned by Huntsman International LLC, a Delaware Corporation
Huntsman International LLC, a Delaware Corporation
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
Other trademarks owned by Huntsman International LLC, a Delaware Corporation
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in agriculture, horticulture and forestry, namely, manures and fertilizers; enzyme substrates for soil-free growing, namely, substrates for growing and cultivating plants, crops and vegetables | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Finished hydrophilic polyurethane foam in the form of slabs, blocks, strips, rods, pipes and flakes for use as media for growing and cultivating plants, crops and vegetables | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials for building green roofs, green walls, vertical gardens, grassing roofs and for growing roof gardens, namely, polymer-based foam; non-metallic building materials for use in controlling, managing and draining moisture and water on roofs, namely, polymer-foam slabs, blocks, strips, flakes and pipes for drainage, plastic conduit for drainage, non-metallic construction materials, namely, drain bases and grates | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jun 26, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 7, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 1, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 30, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 19, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |