Drawing for MISTER FISH

USPTO serial 79093990

MISTER FISH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MISTER FISH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Fish, fish products, preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fishSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 27, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 23, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 3, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 1, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 22, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 22, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 1, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 5, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 5, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 5, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 22, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 18, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 17, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance