Drawing for FUTURE MILL

USPTO serial 79094358

FUTURE MILL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KEARNEY, COLLEEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUTURE MILL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Metalworking machines; machine presses; threading machines; machining centers; drilling machines; grinding machines; engraving machines; trimming machines; pneumatic drills; electrical drills; drilling bits parts of machines; drill chucks parts of machines; bits parts of machines; power-operated screwdrivers for machines; taps parts of machines; lapping machines for metalworking; milling cutters for milling machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Jun 27, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 28, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Mar 18, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 18, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 26, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 26, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 15, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 29, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 29, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 26, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 26, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 30, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Mar 30, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Mar 30, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Mar 29, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 24, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance