USPTO serial 79094387
ELIOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4173440Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2012
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELIOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryce J. Maynard
Bryce J. Maynard BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC1737 KING STREET, SUITE 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Semi-processed plastics for use in manufacture and for industry, excluding plastic foam insulation; semi-processed plastics in the form of bars, blocks, pellets, shafts, sheets and tubes for general manufacturing, excluding plastic foam insulation; plastics in the form of sheets, rods and tubes, excluding plastic foam insulation; plastics in extruded form for general industrial use, excluding plastic foam insulation; plates and rods of plastics, excluding plastic foam insulation; goods made of semi-processed plastics, namely, rods, plates, bars, and tubes, excluding plastic foam insulation; semi-processed plastics in the form of sheets, panels, plates, excluding plastic foam insulation; non-metallic flexible pipes, excluding plastic foam insulation; and plastic accessories for non-metallic flexible pipes, namely, sleeves and gaskets, excluding plastic foam insulation | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Non-metallic building materials, namely, plastic pipe supports, non-metal pipe collars, and non-metal pipe couplings and joints; non-metallic building materials, namely, rigid non-metallic pipes of plastic, polyethylene and composite used in the building of road and agricultural drainage, used for conveying liquid, gas and biogas, used for the protection of electrical networks, used for the protection of optical fiber and cables, used for the protection of tubes made of cross-linked polyethylene and copper; non-metallic gutter pipes, water pipes, sewer pipes and rigid pipes; non-metallic ventilating, air conditioning and heating ducts; non-metallic tubes and filtering tubes used to prevent storm water runoff pollutants from entering sewer systems; non-metallic polyethylene pipes used in geothermal heating and cooling systems | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 29, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 17, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 8, 2012 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 21, 2012 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2012 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 23, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 2, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 1, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2011 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |