USPTO serial 79094388
PROFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David A.W. Wong
David A.W. Wong Barnes & Thornburg LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Toilet preparations, toilet soaps, cosmetics; shampoos; hair conditioners; gels, sprays, mousses and balms for hair styling and hair care; hair dyes; permanent waving and curling preparations; essential oils for personal use, all for personal use in relation to hair | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 021 | Combs, toiletry sponges, hairbrushes, nail brushes; hair care kits sold in toilet bags and cases comprised primarily of hair brushes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 026 | Lace and embroidery; ribbons and braid, artificial flowers, hair ornaments, hair pins, hair slides, hair grips, hair curlers, hair nets | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 15, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2012 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |