Drawing for TIANYU

USPTO serial 79094653

TIANYU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIANYU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Props of metal; building materials of metal; cramps of metal (crampons); fittings of metal for furniture; door handles of metal; ironmongery; locks of metal, other than electric; tanks of metal; signboards of metal; works of art of common metalSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 7, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 14, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 14, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 23, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 23, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 21, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 5, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 5, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 23, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 23, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 7, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 15, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 15, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 15, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 7, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 3, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 31, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance