USPTO serial 79094694
HYBRID CORE CONCEPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4130230Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 24, 2012
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYBRID CORE CONCEPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John W. McGlynn
John W. McGlynn RatnerPrestia2200 Renaissance Boulevard, Suite 350King of Prussia, PA 19406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Scientific and technological services, namely, scientific research, analysis, evaluation, development and testing with respect to products, engineering processes and applications of composite materials and sandwich structured materials; consulting services in the fields of scientific and technological research and development for new products and engineering processes; engineering project planning; scientific and technological services, namely, development of decisions and strategies for conducting scientific and technological research and development in the fields of composite materials, sandwich structured materials, renewable energy, vehicles and transportation; research in the fields of physics and chemistry; technical research in the fields of renewable energy, vehicles and transportation; research in the field of mechanical construction; services for processes of physical and chemical nature, namely, technical, chemical and structural project planning; scientific and technological services, namely, scientific analysis and industrial research in the field of renewable energy, vehicles and transportation; technical project planning; material testing | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 23, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 28, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Dec 17, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2018 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| May 8, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2018 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 24, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 7, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 18, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |