Drawing for BRIGITTE BARDOT

USPTO serial 79094731

BRIGITTE BARDOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4211994Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 25, 2012
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRIGITTE BARDOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

Lawrence E. Apolzon Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Luxury handbags for women made of all types of materials, excluding fabrics made from animals and animal skinsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 7, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 17, 2021CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Mar 6, 2021CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 16, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Feb 21, 2020INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 23, 2020INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jan 23, 2020INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Dec 26, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Aug 29, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 26, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 23, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 7, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 6, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 8, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 18, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 27, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 27, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 25, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 25, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 22, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 20, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 20, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 6, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 6, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 18, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 28, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 27, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 3, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 7, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 28, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 11, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 11, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 4, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 3, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 8, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 4, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 31, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance