Drawing for ARDI BASIC INSTINCT

USPTO serial 79094925

ARDI BASIC INSTINCT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARDI BASIC INSTINCT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Fabrics for underwear; silkSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Lingerie; brassieres; socks; girdles; chemise; corsets; underwear; swimwear; hosiery articlesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
026Laces; belt buckles; cushions for clothes (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 1, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 12, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 29, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 12, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 12, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 12, 2012PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 31, 2012PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 31, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jan 23, 2012PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 22, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 7, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 18, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 18, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 16, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 15, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 7, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance