USPTO serial 79094925
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Fabrics for underwear; silk | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Lingerie; brassieres; socks; girdles; chemise; corsets; underwear; swimwear; hosiery articles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 026 | Laces; belt buckles; cushions for clothes (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 1, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |