Drawing for ARDI BASIC INSTINCT

USPTO serial 79094925

ARDI BASIC INSTINCT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FRYE, KIMBERLY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARDI BASIC INSTINCT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Fabrics for underwear; silkSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
025Lingerie; brassieres; socks; girdles; chemise; corsets; underwear; swimwear; hosiery articlesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
026Laces; belt buckles; cushions for clothes (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 17, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 1, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 12, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 12, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 29, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 12, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 12, 2012PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Jan 31, 2012PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Jan 31, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Jan 23, 2012PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 23, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 22, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 7, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 18, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 18, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 16, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 15, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 8, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 8, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 7, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance