Drawing for MACHINE IDENTIFICATION MODULE (MIM)

USPTO serial 79095125

MACHINE IDENTIFICATION MODULE (MIM)

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4120102Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 3, 2012
Examiner
POLZER, NATALIE M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MACHINE IDENTIFICATION MODULE (MIM)?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Devasena Reddy

Devasena Reddy HM LAW GROUP LLP19925 Stevens Creek Blvd,Suite 100Cupertino, CA 95014

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Encoded electronic chip cards that allow both wireless and wired machine systems to communicate with other devices of the same abilitySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 3, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 201871AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Oct 17, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 3, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 3, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 3, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 28, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 25, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 5, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 5, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 5, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 22, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 18, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Apr 14, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance