Drawing for EASY FILT

USPTO serial 79095180

EASY FILT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EASY FILT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Dosage dispensersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
011Water purification apparatus and systems, specifically for the eco-friendly and/or chemical-free treatment of water; water softeners and limescale protection systems, essentially consisting of physical apparatus and instruments for the treatment of water; water conditioning systems; water conditioning apparatus; water filters; desalination systemsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 21, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 31, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 23, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 3, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 1, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 7, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 19, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 19, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 2, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 25, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 5, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 5, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 5, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 4, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 19, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 14, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance