Drawing for POLYCOIL

USPTO serial 79095229

POLYCOIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4047618Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 1, 2011
Examiner
CARLSON, KRISTIN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POLYCOIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julia Anne Matheson

Julia Anne Matheson Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett &901 New York Avenue, NWWashington, DC 20001-4413UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals and their alloys, goods of common metal, included in this class, in particular sheets and plates, strips, bands, sections, in particular of low-alloy copper alloys for the electricity and electronics industriesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
040Treatment of materials, in particular services relating to the rolling of metal and coating with metalSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 28, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 15, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Feb 15, 2019INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Feb 14, 2019INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 8, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 8, 2018C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Nov 1, 2016REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 1, 2012FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 8, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 8, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Feb 1, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 1, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 23, 2011GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 16, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Aug 16, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 3, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 3, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 24, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 21, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 20, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 20, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 19, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 19, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 15, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 14, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance