Drawing for MITA

USPTO serial 79095446

MITA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4113539Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 20, 2012
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with MITA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard M. LaBarge

Richard M. LaBarge Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP233 South Wacker Drive, Suite 6300Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical sensors, [ electronic sensors and ] computer hardware for wind mills and for automation industries, wind power plants, wind turbines and other wind-operated machines; control and monitoring equipment, namely, electronic controllers for automatically turning on or off the generator and for automatic starting after public power line break-downs; [ electronic sensors and controllers for overvoltage protection against strokes of lightning; ] microprocessors for controlling and monitoring constant voltage, frequency, phase conditions, rotor speed, efficiency and thickness of brake pads, temperature, wind direction and wind speed; [ vibration electronic sensors for installation in mill housings; ] watt-hour meters [ ; structural parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods ]ACTIVE—
011[ Solar power plants, wind and hydroelectric power plants, gas turbine power plants, condenser power plants, combined power and heating plants, pump and air magazine power plants for the production and distribution of energy and for automation industries; industrial purifying installations for the handling of waste, air, water and energy products; Steam generators and generating installations and structural parts therefor ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
037Erection, construction, installation, maintenance and repair of wind mills, [ solar power plants ] and [ of the automation plants, ] wind power plants; custom construction of wind turbines and other wind-operated machines; advisory, consultancy and information services relating to all the aforesaid servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2023INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jun 27, 2023INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 26, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 28, 2023INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Sep 28, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2022PRANPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED—
Sep 28, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 19, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2022ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 20, 2021REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2019INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Dec 19, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Dec 19, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 5, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
May 31, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2018NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 201871.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Apr 4, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 19, 2018ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 31, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 20, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 20, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 14, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2011ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 18, 2011LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2011LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jul 30, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 15, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 15, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 14, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 25, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance