Drawing for VISTAN

USPTO serial 79095450

VISTAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISTAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harold J Fassnacht

Harold J Fassnacht Miller Matthias & Hull, LLPOne North Franklin StreetSuite 2350Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Spectacles, spectacle frames, spectacle lenses, sunglassesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Oct 10, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 29, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 9, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Sep 7, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 13, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 26, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 26, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 7, 2012MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Sep 7, 2012ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE
Feb 9, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Feb 9, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 11, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 21, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 19, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 12, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 20, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 20, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 20, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 26, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 21, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance