Drawing for DAMOISELLE D - LE TEMPS PRÉCIEUX -

USPTO serial 79095457

DAMOISELLE D - LE TEMPS PRÉCIEUX -

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HELLMAN, ELI J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAMOISELLE D - LE TEMPS PRÉCIEUX -?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Jewelry; jewelry articles, precious stones; timepieces and chronometric instruments; precious metals and their alloys; watch cases, bracelets (jewelry), chains (jewelry), medals; cases or presentation cases for timepiecesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2022UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Nov 23, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 22, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 30, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 11, 2013OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 9, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 9, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 26, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 26, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 1, 2012FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2012FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jan 24, 2012FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 9, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2011ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 2, 2011CREVCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED
Jul 24, 2011CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jul 4, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 13, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 13, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 10, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 9, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 26, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 21, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance