Drawing for Serial No. 79095544

USPTO serial 79095544

Serial No. 79095544

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4148326Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 29, 2012
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
MADRID PROCESSING UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79095544?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas M. Champagne

Thomas M. Champagne IP Strategies, P.C.12950 WORLDGATE DR STE 100HERNDON, VA 20170-6005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for lighting, namely, lighting fixtures; apparatus for heating, namely, warming drawers; apparatus for steam generating, namely, steam generators; apparatus for cooking, namely, cooking ovens and stove-tops; apparatus for refrigerating, namely, refrigerators; apparatus for drying, namely, clothes drying machines; apparatus for ventilating, namely, ventilation hoods; apparatus for water supply, namely, water faucets and sinks; and apparatus for sanitary purposes, namely, pipes being parts of sanitary facilities, toiletsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
037Building construction; repair of household plumbing, appliances, and fixtures; installation of household plumbing, appliances, and fixturesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2014ERFTTEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED
Apr 3, 2014DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Apr 3, 2014DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 24, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 25, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 1, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 1, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 1, 2012LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Aug 29, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 23, 2012LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
May 29, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 13, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Mar 13, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 22, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Feb 3, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 1, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 18, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 29, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Dec 28, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 16, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 16, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 11, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 20, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 20, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 19, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 26, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 22, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 21, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance