USPTO serial 79095577
GILLETTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HALMEN, KATHERINE E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GILLETTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Obshchestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu "Shest' banok"
RU-105066 Moskva, RU
Other trademarks owned by Obshchestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu "Shest' banok"
Obshchestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu "PORTA"
RU
Other trademarks owned by Obshchestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu "PORTA"
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Accumulators, electric; accumulators, electric, for vehicles; batteries for pocketlamps; batteries, electric; battery boxes; plates for batteries; chargers for electric batteries; batteries; AA batteries | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Obshchestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu "Shest' banok"
- Other trademarks owned by Obshchestvo s ogranichennoy otvetstvennost'yu "PORTA"
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named GILLETTE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2012 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2012 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 27, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 27, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 27, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |