USPTO serial 79095626
GARIZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GARIZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely pullovers, skirts, dresses, blouses, jeans, trousers, jackets, coats, raincoats, anoraks, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, shorts, overalls, underclothing, bodices, brassieres, camisoles, underpants, dressing gowns, bath robes, bathing suits, pajamas, gloves, ski suits; headgear namely hats, caps, knitted caps, berets; bootwear namely shoes excluding orthopaedic shoes, slippers, boots sandals, beach shoes, sports shoes, lace boots, shoe parts namely heelpieces, heels, footwear uppers; stocking; belts; ties, foulards, neckties, shawls, scarves, mufflers, neck scarves, sarongs, collars for dresses, maniples, muffs, wristbands, suspenders, bracer for clothing, garters, bandanas, headbands; clothing for babies, namely babies' diapers of textile | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Retail services in relation to clothing | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2013 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 29, 2012 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 11, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 11, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 4, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 3, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |