USPTO serial 79095776
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Aerated mineral waters; aerated spring waters; aerated water; bottled water (not for medical purposes); carbonated water; drinking water; mineral water (beverages); natural mineral water (not for medical purposes); natural water (not for medical purposes); non-medicated mineral spring waters; preparations for making aerated water; preparations for making mineral water; soda water; spring water (beverages), other than for medical purposes; still water (not for medical purposes); table waters; tonic water (non-medicated beverages); water (beverage) other than for medical use; water for drinking (other than for medical purposes); waters (beverages) | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 31, 2013 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 31, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 30, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |