USPTO serial 79095849
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Boston bags; carry-on bags; folding briefcases; gladstone bags; shoulder bags; suitcases; briefcases; travelling trunks; key cases; business card cases; canvas shopping bags; leather shopping bags; purses; wallets; backpacks; beach bags; attaché cases made of leather or textile; credit card wallets; handbags; pouches of leather or textile; rucksacks; shoulder belts of leather; garment bags for travel made of leather or textile; schoolbags; traveling bags of leather or textile; unfitted vanity cases; bags for umbrellas; beach umbrellas; sun umbrellas; rainproof parasols; telescopic umbrellas; umbrella covers; umbrellas; bags for packaging of leather; clothing for domestic pets; dog shoes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 4, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 30, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 1, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2011 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 28, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 6, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 6, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |