Drawing for MULTI-MATIC

USPTO serial 79095859

MULTI-MATIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4133663Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2012
Examiner
BOAGNI, MARY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MULTI-MATIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Greenblum

Neil F. Greenblum Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Yarn warp preparation machines for textile manufacturing, yarn warping machines, direct beamers, namely, threading machines, beaming machines for use in textile manufacturing; yarn warping machines for the production of stencils and sample warps; textile machines, namely, machines for printing textiles, textile bonding machines, textile dyeing machines, textile tentering machines, and weaving machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Oct 3, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 19, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 8, 2021CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Dec 5, 2020CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 9, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Jul 2, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 25, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 23, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Sep 23, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Sep 11, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Feb 1, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Jan 10, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 24, 2018PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15
Apr 24, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 4, 2018ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
May 1, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 16, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 4, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 17, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 1, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 1, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 14, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 14, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 25, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 9, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 9, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 6, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 19, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 16, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 20, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 28, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 28, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 25, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 24, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 3, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 28, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance