Drawing for PIGMAPOL

USPTO serial 79095935

PIGMAPOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HALMEN, KATHERINE E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PIGMAPOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Paints, varnishes, lacquers, and auxiliaries (thickeners); auto, construction and industrial paints; anticorrosive materials, pigments for paint, preservatives against deterioration of wood (impregnated materials), preservatives against deterioration of metal; binding and thinning agents for paints (binder, thinner), fixing agents for leather, wood and textile (color fixing), shoe dyes, printing inks; food stuff colorants, pharmaceutical colorants and beverage colorants, linseed varnishesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2016DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Apr 29, 2016DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jan 11, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 24, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Dec 23, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 24, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 3, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 3, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 23, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 23, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 27, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 27, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 27, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 26, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 3, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 29, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 28, 2011SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance