USPTO serial 79095972
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles H Jew
Charles H Jew Cascio & Zervas236 West Portal Ave. Ste. 533San Francisco, CA 94127UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing and fashion wear, namely, dresses, bridal dresses, evening wear dresses, cocktail dresses, skirts, blouses, lingerie, camisoles, jumpers, shorts, trousers, pants, stoles, fascinators, t-shirts, shirts, jackets, suits, coats, jackets, pajamas, singlets, scarves, belts, footwear, namely, shoes, boots, sandals and slippers, and headgear, namely, hats and caps | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design of clothing, footwear, headgear, fashion accessories and jewelry | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2014 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2014 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 14, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 27, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 14, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 14, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |