USPTO serial 79096043
ORASCOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4277661Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2013
- Examiner
- ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ORASCOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NL-6167 AC Geleen, NL
NL-6167 AC Geleen, NL
Cario, EG
NL-6167 AC Geleen, NL
NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher A. Proskey
Christopher A. Proskey BrownWinick Law Firm666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000Des Moines, IA 50309UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | [ Chemicals used in industry in particular chemical preparations for the treatment of cement; chemicals used in agriculture, horticulture and forestry, in particular fertilizers; manures ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | [ Non-metallic rigid pipes for building; asphalt, pitch and bitumen; non-metallic transportable buildings; monuments, not of metal ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Building construction; construction of steel structures; construction of cement structure; piling and foundation works; repair of power plants, oil and petrol plants, petrochemical plants, [ road and transportation infrastructure, water and wastewater infrastructure, ] industrial buildings and commercial buildings; installation services, namely, installation of irrigation, electrical, [ lighting, fire] [ alarm, ] [ detection and suppression, transportation and traffic equipment, heating, ventilating and air conditioning, security systems ] for power plants, oil and petrol plants, petrochemical plants, [ road and transportation infrastructure, water and wastewater infrastructure, ] industrial buildings and commercial buildings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OCI Nitrogen B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by OCI Nitrogen B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Orascom Construction PLC
- Other trademarks owned by OCI Nitrogen B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by OCI N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named ORASCOM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2024 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2024 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Aug 6, 2023 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2023 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 1, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2021 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 26, 2021 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 26, 2021 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 23, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | PR71 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71 | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 3, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 15, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 22, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 17, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |