USPTO serial 79096152
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Wells IP Law299 S. Main St., Suite 1300Salt Lake City, UT 84111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics, cosmetic creams; lotions for cosmetic purposes; cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes; make-up removing preparations; extracts of flowers for use as perfumes; ethereal essences, essential oils, essential oils for toilet purposes, oils for perfumes and scents, perfumery, perfumes, potpourris, namely, fragrances | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Export-import agencies and wholesale and retail store services all featuring cosmetics, cosmetic preparations for skin care, cosmetic creams, skin-whitening creams, cosmetic preparations for slimming purposes, cosmetics kits, ointments for cosmetic purposes, beauty masks, cleansing milk for toilet purposes, sun-tanning preparations, namely, cosmetics, lotions for cosmetic purposes, astringents for cosmetic purposes, cosmetic preparations for baths, mouthwashes, not for medical purposes, lipsticks, make-up preparations, make-up removing preparations, depilatory preparations, dentifrices, shaving preparations, shaving lotions, shampoos, hair lotions, hairspray, hair dyes, pomades for cosmetic purposes, extracts of flowers, namely, perfumes, ethereal essences, essential oils, oils for toilet purposes, oils for perfumes and scents, perfumery, perfumes, fragrances in the nature of potpourris, nail care preparations, false nails, nail varnish, lacquer-removing preparations, cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes, tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions, toiletries, pumice stone, deodorants for personal use, colorants for toilet purposes, eyebrow cosmetics, cosmetic pencils, cosmetic preparations for eyelashes, mascara, adhesives for cosmetic purposes, false eyelashes, talcum powder, for toilet use, washing preparations, soap, cakes of soap, medicated soap, sachets for perfuming linen, laundry soaking preparations, fabric softeners for laundry use, laundry preparations, stain removers, detergents other than for use in manufacturing operations and for medical purposes, colour-brightening chemicals for household and laundry purposes, polish for furniture and flooring, shoe polish, leather preservatives, namely, polishes, polishing preparations, shining preparations, namely, polishes, windscreen cleaning liquids, cleaning preparations, scouring solutions, cosmetics for animals | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 28, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 12, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 11, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |