Drawing for SAHIN

USPTO serial 79096168

SAHIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VAGHANI, MAYUR C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAHIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Agricultural, horticultural and forestry products and grains not included in other classes; live animals; fresh fruits and vegetables; seeds, natural plants and flowers; foodstuffs for animals; maltSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Oct 3, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 15, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 6, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 21, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 7, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 14, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 12, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 30, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 10, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 10, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 26, 2012NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 12, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 12, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 12, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 4, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 16, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 16, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 16, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 15, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 14, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 10, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 6, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
May 5, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance