Drawing for IT. STYLE BY MILANO

USPTO serial 79096256

IT. STYLE BY MILANO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IT. STYLE BY MILANO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cleansing cream, tonic lotion, moisturizer cream, day cream, night cream, wrinkle cream, whitening cream, eyes gel, lip cream, face packs, body cream, anti cellulite gel, toning cream, anti stretch mark cream, leg cream, foot cream, hand cream, deodorants, perfume, massage cream and oil, depilation cream, bath cream, shower cream, after-bath body lotion, intimate cleansers, hand cleaning gels, shampoo, oil shampoo, moisturizing oil, hair balsams, hair gel, non-medicated hair restoration lotions, sunscreen, aftersun cream, suntan cream, cosmetic creams, scrub cream, lice shampoo, liquid talc for cosmetic use, eau de Cologne, eau de toilette, after shave cream, shaving gel, cosmetic preparations to retard hair growth, warm-up massage oil, cosmetic slimming cream, scrub soapsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 13, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 22, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 26, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 30, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 7, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 5, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 4, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 17, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 17, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 5, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 9, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 7, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 7, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 6, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 25, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 21, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 17, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 17, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 13, 2011LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
May 12, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance