USPTO serial 79096273
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
India E. Vincent
India E. Vincent Burr & Forman LLPSuite 3400420 North Twentieth StreetBirmingham, AL 35203| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Communication software for product lifecycle, asset, renewals, annuities and license maintenance and management; downloadable computer programs and recorded software distributed online, namely, computer programs and recorded software for product lifecycle, asset, renewals, annuities and license maintenance and management; computer software for product lifecycle, asset, renewals, annuities and license maintenance and management; computer software programs for product lifecycle, asset, renewals, annuities and license maintenance and management; computer software for business purposes, namely, for product lifecycle, asset, renewals, annuities and license maintenance and management; computer software programs for database management; data communications software for product lifecycle, asset, renewals, annuities and license maintenance and management; data processing software for, namely, product lifecycle, asset, renewals, annuities and license maintenance and management; integrated software packages for product lifecycle, asset, renewals, annuities and license maintenance and management; network management computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Computerized database management services and data processing services for others namely, collection and systemization of information in computer databases related to business assets via an online/computer based asset register | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Advisory services relating to computer software; computer software programming services; design and development of computer software for others; design of computer software; development of computer software; development of computer software application solutions; development of software; hosting of software as a service (SaaS) services, namely hosting database software for product lifecycle, asset, renewals, annuities and license maintenance and management; online provisions of non-downloadable web-based software for product lifecycle, asset, renewals, annuities and license maintenance and management; software creation; software engineering; writing of computer software | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 11, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 12, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 4, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2012 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 21, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |