Drawing for EKO-66

USPTO serial 79096341

EKO-66

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4173459Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 17, 2012
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EKO-66?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey H. Greger

Jeffrey H. Greger Lowe Hauptman Ham & Berner, LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400Alexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Fuel conversion apparatus, namely, a mechanical device for installing into internal combustion engines to increase fuel economy, in the nature of a liquid petroleum gas conversion kitSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 2, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Nov 30, 2019INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 6, 2019XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Nov 6, 2019XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Oct 22, 2019INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 19, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 22, 2019C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
May 11, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 1, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 14, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 19, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Oct 19, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 17, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 17, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 1, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 11, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 11, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 24, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 24, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 3, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 3, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 14, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 1, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 6, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 17, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Dec 17, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 24, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 24, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 21, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 20, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 13, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 13, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 12, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance