Drawing for OYYO

USPTO serial 79096383

OYYO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, KAREN
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OYYO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumery, cosmetics, soapsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
009Optical (terms considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13.2.b) of the Common Regulations)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
014Jewellery, precious stones, horological and chronological instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
018Suitcases and travelling bagsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
025Clothing, footwearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2021DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 22, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 30, 2013FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 7, 2013FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2013FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2012OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 17, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2012OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 11, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 23, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 23, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 20, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 20, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 12, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance