Drawing for WHY THE BEST HOTELS

USPTO serial 79096429

WHY THE BEST HOTELS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4133683Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 1, 2012
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHY THE BEST HOTELS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cecelia M. Perry

BELVEDERE ANGELICO SRLVIALE GIACOMO MATTEOTTI 2 B/CBARBERINO DI MUGELLOFIRENZE, I-50031

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Hotels and providing food and drink services; hotel and restaurant reservation servicesSECTION 18 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2021DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Sep 19, 2021DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 7, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Sep 7, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Sep 7, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 20, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 20, 2017C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL
Dec 20, 2017CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Dec 13, 2017CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999
Sep 14, 2017PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
May 1, 2017REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 18, 2012GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 29, 2012FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 3, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 3, 2012FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 1, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 1, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 14, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 14, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2012OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 25, 2012OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 25, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Jan 6, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 5, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 15, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 1, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 1, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 18, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 2, 2011RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 2, 2011RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 2, 2011RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 18, 2011MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 14, 2011NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 12, 2011REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance