USPTO serial 79096449
MICROBURST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4123667Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2012
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICROBURST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL-5621 BA EINDHOVEN, NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL-5621 BA EINDHOVEN, NL
Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAWN C. WOLFF, EDWARD W. GOODMAN, EDWARD BLOCKER, MICHAEL E. MARION, DAVID SCHREIBER
DAWN C. WOLFF, EDWARD W. GOODMAN, EDWARD BLOCKER, PHILIPS IP&S465 COLUMBUS AVENUE, SUITE 340VALHALLA, NY 10595UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Toothbrushes and electric toothbrushes and parts, water apparatus for cleaning teeth and gums for home use, Apparatus for cleaning teeth and gums using high pressure water for home use; flossing instruments for dental care, namely, dental floss; apparatus using water and air for cleaning teeth and gums | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Koninklijke Philips N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named MICROBURST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2021 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2018 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 10, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 28, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 6, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 24, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 22, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 11, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 23, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |