USPTO serial 79096506
DENGLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENGLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machinery systems for metal processing and machining and metal working, in particular machines and systems for the welding of metal work pieces and for the bending of tubes as well as parts thereof; tools (as machine components) for automated tube processing machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Computer software for the automatic or automated control of machines for metal processing and machining and metal working, in particular of tube processing machines; simulation programmes (computer software) for the machining and processing of tubes; programmes stored on storage media of all kinds for the automatic or automated control of the aforementioned machines and systems of class 7 | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design, planning and construction planning of front ends, apparatuses and production plants for the manufacture of body shells, automatic welding and assembly plants, auxiliary devices and handling apparatuses, automatic CNC tube bending machines and apparatuses as well as conveying systems and storage systems; construction planning of electric components, groups of components and component systems; development of programmes (software) for the automatic or automated operation of the aforementioned apparatuses, machines and systems; design, development, installation and maintenance of computer software for the automated operation of machines, in particular of tube processing machines; design, development, installation and maintenance of simulation programmes (software) for the machining and processing of tubes; development, technical planning and construction of automated tube processing machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2021 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2021 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2012 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 11, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 24, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |