USPTO serial 79096827
ROKAMAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4127382Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 2012
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ROKAMAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
75196 Remchingen, DE
75196 Remchingen, DE
Remchingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A. Cigelnik
1037 CONCORD CIRMUNDELEIN, IL 60060UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for the building and construction industry, in particular machines for surface processing; painting machines; milling machines; peristaltic pumps; grinding and polishing machines; steam cleaning machines; grinding machines; grinding discs as parts of machines; vacuum cleaners; vacuum cleaner bags; suction nozzles for vacuum cleaners; vacuum cleaner hoses; machine tools for the building and construction industry, in particular machine tools for surface processing; tool discs as parts of machines, namely, discs for surface processing, in particular for cleaning, polishing, grinding, scraping or smoothing, and discs for removing wallpaper or plaster; parts of the aforesaid goods, included in this class; fittings for the aforesaid goods, included in this class | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | [ Machinery installation, maintenance and repair; rental of machines for the building and construction industry ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2023 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2022 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Apr 2, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2021 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2021 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Mar 1, 2019 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 1, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2013 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 17, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 17, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 31, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 19, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 31, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 27, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |