USPTO serial 79096975
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Gyeongsangnam-do, KR
Gyeongsangnam-do, KR
Gyeongsangnam-do, KR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Yoon S. Ham
Yoon S. Ham LOWE HAUPTMAN HAM & BERNER LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric grinding mills for cooking; electric mixers for household purposes; electric washing machines for household purposes; electric whisks for household purposes; electric fruit presses for household purposes; electric food grinders for household purposes; electric meat grinders for household purposes; electric coffee grinders for household purposes; electric ice crushers for household purposes; electric food blenders for household purposes; vacuum cleaner hoses; vacuum cleaners; vacuum cleaner bags; electric vacuum cleaners; power-operated coffee grinders for household use; electric pepper mills; clothes washing machines; dishwashers; automatic dishwashers; electric washing machines for household purposes; electric shoe polishing machines; electric can openers; electric carpet cleaning machines; electric wax-polishing machines for household purposes; electric steam cleaning machines for household purposes; electrically powered steam cleaning device comprising a hose and nozzle and a vapor-producing chamber that is attached to a water source for household purposes | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2020 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2012 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2011 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2011 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2011 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2011 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |